• Login
    View Item 
    •   KABU Repository Home
    • Journal Articles and research Publications
    • Publications 2019
    • View Item
    •   KABU Repository Home
    • Journal Articles and research Publications
    • Publications 2019
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    L2012-06 Judicial Radical Surgery in Kenya: Beyond Independence and Accountability

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full Text Download (179.9Kb)
    Date
    2015-03
    Author
    Charles, Khamala A
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    A 1989 World Bank Development Report recognized anticorruption and good governance as prerequisites for Sub-Saharan economic development. Kenya’s democratic transition entailed inter alia economic liberalization and the rule of law. However, retention of the welfare-reducing Constitution perpetuated social injustice. In 2003, constrained by an absent “rule of law culture” and negative economic growth, the new Kenyan government chose incremental judicial reforms over comprehensive constitutional reforms. It assumed that retaining the “second best” Westminster Constitution while prioritizing construction of infrastructure, would necessarily result in “second best” overall social welfare. It was wrong. Nevertheless, the new Chief Justice implemented unprecedented “radical judicial surgery” recommending that half the purportedly-corrupt judiciary should be removed by Presidential tribunals of inquiry. Furthermore, newly-appointed High Court judges endorsed the “radical surgery.” However, declining public confidence in the judicial reform process culminated in refusal by the opposition party to petition the hotly-disputed 2007 presidential election results, alleging biased courts. Widespread post-election violence further decreased overall social welfare, as indicated by the country’s subsequent promulgation of a new Constitution. Ultimately, the High Court declared the “radical surgery” illegal. Given inconsistent and novel approaches to vetting of judicial professionalism, it is useful to learn lessons from previous and from comparative experiences in transitional contexts to critically determine the extent to which various scrutinizing procedures are predicated on political expediency, human rights principles or a combination of both. By applying “the general theorem of second best,” this paper shall attempt to measure the impact of Kenya’s radical judicial reform strategy on the independence and accountability of judicial officials, and on overall social welfare
    URI
    http://ir.kabarak.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1450
    Collections
    • Publications 2019 [91]

    Copyright © 2025 
    Kabarak University Libraries
    | Repository Policy | Send Feedback
     

    Browse

    All of KABU RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2025 
    Kabarak University Libraries
    | Repository Policy | Send Feedback