• Login
    View Item 
    •   KABU Repository Home
    • Journal Articles and research Publications
    • School of Business and Economics
    • Department of Commerce
    • View Item
    •   KABU Repository Home
    • Journal Articles and research Publications
    • School of Business and Economics
    • Department of Commerce
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of Porter’s Generic Strategies on Firm Performance of Tyre Dealers in Nairobi County, Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text Download (291.5Kb)
    Date
    2023-09
    Author
    IMBWAGA, Edmond
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The study sought to assess the effect of Porter’s generic strategies on firm performance of Tyre dealers within Nairobi County. The study adopted a descriptive research design. The population of the study were tyre dealers in Nairobi County. A sample of 200 tyre dealers was picked through random sampling in Nairobi County. Out of the targeted tyre dealers that were picked through simple random sampling, 108 were responsive indicating 54% response rate, this large sample ensured the reliability of the responses while the mode of structure of the questionnaires guaranteed the validity of the data collected. After analysis of the data through correlation and multiple regression, it was deduced that there is a strong effect of porter’s generic strategies on firm performance, with a strong correlation co-efficient of 0.975, 0.928 and 0.976 for cost leadership, differentiation and focus respectively. Multiple regression deduced that 95.2% of firm performance was attributed to cost leadership, differentiation and focus strategies based on the regression model. Based on the regression model cost leadership has a deduced coefficient of 0.84 implying that an increase in a unit of firm performance due to an increase in 0.84 unit of cost leadership. Differentiation generated a co-efficient of 0.09 implying increase in one unit of performance due to an increase in 0.09 unit of differentiation Focus strategy deduced a co-efficient of -0.05 implying a reduction of a unit of performance by an increased in practice of focus by 0.05. This overall indicated that cost leadership and differentiation have a positive effect on performance while focus strategy has a negative effect on firm performance.
    URI
    http://ir.kabarak.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1543
    Collections
    • Department of Commerce [20]

    Copyright © 2025 
    Kabarak University Libraries
    | Repository Policy | Send Feedback
     

    Browse

    All of KABU RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2025 
    Kabarak University Libraries
    | Repository Policy | Send Feedback