Prevalence, Perception and Consequences of Sexual Harassment in Kenyan Institutions of Higher Learning
Abstract
The issue of sexual harassment in academia is increasingly becoming the centre of discussion.
Indeed, in most educational institutions, sexual harassment and gender-based violence have
become an issue of research and discussion. More and more students are currently joining
institutions of higher learning, many of which are not sufficiently equipped to handle sexual
harassment on campus. Kenyan universities are a good sample representative of the larger
society because their students are drawn from a cross-section of all communities. Exploring their
pedagogical practices may, therefore, offer valuable insights into the broader understanding of
how they play a meaningful role in empowering young Kenyans by promoting a harassment-free
environment. However, the bulk of existing research has examined sexual harassment in nonacademic
settings, and only recently have social scientists begun treating sexual harassment in
the academic setting as an important area of inquiry. Although several recent studies have
established sexual harassment to be pervasive in learning institutions, little is known about the
frequency, severity and types of sexual harassment occurring in specific educational institutions.
This paper explores students’ attitude and consequences of sexual harassment on campus. It also
looks into the general perception that students have concerning harassment. In a cross-sectional
survey, 389 respondents filled a questionnaire on sexual harassment. Quantitative statistical
analysis revealed that sexual harassment was significantly prevalent in academia. Two-thirds of
university students are subjected to sexual harassment before they join campus. Many of the
respondents acceded to have been subjected to sexually harassing behaviours but were resistant
to label themselves as survivors of harassment. The perception was high among undergraduate
students. Recommendations for the improvement of the situation to create a freer and safer
campus environment as well as suggestions for further research are made.